Ed Buck: Major Democratic Party Donor and Depraved Sexual Predator

Ed Buck was a wealthy self-proclaimed LGBTQ advocate and major donor to Democrat Party candidates and causes. Unbeknownst to those members of the powerful and influential circles with whom he regularly mingled, Buck was a dangerous and degenerate sexual deviant who preyed upon the most vulnerable in our society.

Born Edward Bernard Peter Buckmelter on August 24, 1954, to an affluent family in Steubenville, Ohio, young Eddie enjoyed a pleasant if not sheltered childhood. There seemed to be no indicators during Eddie’s childhood that might have led others to predict that one day he would become a criminal sexual predator. Shortly after his 16th Birthday in 1970, Eddie boldly announced to his stunned, conservative parents, “…I am a homosexual.”

This came at a time when the American Psychiatric Association (APA) still maintained that homosexuality was a “mental disorder.” Further, within American society of that era, gay people were viewed unfavorably by the vast majority of the public. It was a daring proclamation for a teenaged boy to make at that time. After finishing high school, Eddie moved to Arizona where he attended and graduated from Phoenix College.  A few years later, he purchased his friend’s courier service business out of bankruptcy with the assistance of his wealthy parents. He made a major success of the operation and sold the concern at an enormous profit. By this time, Eddie had changed his last name to “Buck.”

In November of 1986, Eddie became incensed when the populist conversative Republican, Evan Mecham was elected Governor of Arizona. In response to “those stupid voters” who chose Mecham, Eddie organized a committee to recall the Governor Elect. This action raised young Eddie’s profile on the political stage for the first time. Eddie was collecting signatures for the recall effort even before Mecham’s inauguration. The liberal Phoenix media fawned over Eddie, the “young gay man,” who was working to recall Evan Mecham. Eddie became a cause célèbres to Arizona liberals.

Yet not all of the media attention was favorable to Eddie. There were still some old-fashioned reporters who believed in doing their research. These types of journalists wanted to know a little more about Eddie and his background. They were unwilling to settle for a superficial interview to get a memorable soundbite or juicy quote.

Hence, when Eddie thrust himself into the eye of the media storm surrounding Evan Mecham, he naively failed to consider that certain embarrassing details about his own past conduct might be made public. Thus Eddie, who had become accustomed to adulation and puff from the press, was shocked one morning when he opened his newspaper to find stories about his recent legal problems.

Eddie it appeared, had been arrested for “public sexual indecency” in 1983. Yes, Eddie enjoyed having sex with men in public places. In a separate incident, he was indicted for “attempting to obtain a narcotic through fraud or deceit” when he tried to pass a fake prescription for Percocet. Eddie was also a prolific drug user. It soon became obvious to Arizonians that this guy was not all he or his media admirers claimed he was. While his crimes were not as serious as those which would later send him to prison, it was evident to most that Eddie was a person with serious character flaws. A couple of years later, Eddie would pull up his proverbial tent pegs and seek a more politically suitable climate. Sometime in 1988, Eddie quietly relocated to West Hollywood, California.

When West Hollywood or “WeHo” as the locals call it, was incorporated as a city in 1984. It was then known as the first “majority-gay municipality in the United States. It was no accident that Eddie decided to move there. The culture and political environment was far more favorable to him than that of Arizona in the 1980s. Eddie, who was already financially well off took on the persona of a LGBTQ advocate and made fast friends among the affluent WeHo gay community. Eddie also wasted no time in ingratiating himself to the California Democratic party and Democratic elected officials through his generous donations.

Eddie settled into a fashionable apartment on WeHo’s North Laurel Avenue. It was a quiet little place. Yet, Eddie didn’t exhibit the same bubbly social personality to his new neighbors, that he was known for when mixing with gay community leaders and Democratic Party officials. It was as if he did not want his new neighbors to know too much about him.  

Eddie’s new neighbors in his apartment building eventually took notice of the heavy foot traffic moving in and out of his apartment late at night and during the wee hours of the morning. Some of these neighbors became concerned with the type of people coming and going out of Eddie’s place at those strange times. Many of Eddie’s “guests” looked a little, “rough around the edges,” according to one neighbor. The consensus among Eddie’s fellow building residents appeared to be that these frightening looking men posed a potential threat to their safety.

Although Ed Buck was well known by the WeHo elites and Democratic Party power brokers, the neighbors in his Laurel avenue apartment building knew little if anything about him. When a couple of Eddie’s neighbors mustered the pluck to ask him directly about the alarming late-night visits from his unkempt plebeian friends, Eddie offered an unflinchingly calm explanation with an apology.

“I’m so sorry. I’m a social worker,” Eddie lied then continued along in the following vein, “These are men in real need of my help as they’re struggling with an assortment of serious issues. They’re all really good men and quite harmless.”

A bold-faced lie, yes. However, Eddie undoubtedly found his use of deceit preferable to telling the truth, which might have sounded something like this, “Gee, I’m really sorry folks. The various drug dealers I use prefer to make their deliveries late at night.  Also, I insist that the numerous vulnerable men of color whom I sexually exploit after getting them hooked on methamphetamine and other dangerous drugs, also show up in the wee hours after the illegal narcotics have arrived. Logistically speaking, it just works out so much better that way!”

As implausible as it may seem, Eddie’s neighbors bought the line about his being a “social worker.”  Initially, there were no outward signs of Buck’s debauched character which would have given his neighbors cause for concern.  After all, Buck seemed urbane, gentlemanly, and erudite. He dressed conservatively and was immaculately groomed- at least in public.

In his new fashionable WeHo life, he was a noted LGBTQ activist and a deep pocketed donor to liberal candidates and causes. Eddie had arrived. There would be no more puerile frauds to score drugs with a forged prescription or uncouth forays into cottaging (anonymous gay sex in public places). Eddie had learned from his youthful morasses with the police in Arizona.

 Yet behind the closed doors and drawn curtains of apartment number 4 at 1234 North Laurel Avenue, Eddie had created his own erotic pleasure-dome. The swanky pad was attractively furnished and supplied with several plush abutted mattresses on the living room floor for late night fun.  A large chest adorned a corner of the living room- Eddie’s little box of fun. Its contents included various sex toys, syringes, pipes, lighters, and plastic zip lock bags containing copious amounts different illicit drugs. The later provided by Eddie’s dealers who would discretely and courteously deliver his dope with the decorum of a luxury hotel concierge.

Eddie would spend hours online, perusing the various gay hook-up sites in search suitable sex partners. Eddie was finicky and would not compromise when picking his late-night guests. He had standards, don’t you know?

Eddie’s ideal playfellow had to be a fit and well-endowed black man who was experiencing problems in life which made him vulnerable. These vulnerable down-on their-luck men were usually homeless, unemployed, or going through other challenges. Eddie wanted men that he could exploit.

Eddie was known to offer certain inducements to otherwise reluctant sexual recruits. These included promises of drugs and at times, even cash and other gifts. Eddie was an old man after all and not particularly pleasing to eye. There was no reason for fit, attractive young men to share his company absent some kind of inducement.  In this, Eddie crossed the line into illegality.

Soon, Eddie’s late-night sexual partners started arriving at his doorstep- one after the other. Punctually so, the same way his drug dealers did. At some point, more than one of Eddie’s partners became hooked on the types of drugs he was supplying and at times, injecting them with. Once his sexual partners became hooked, Buck must have soon realized that these men would do just about anything to get their next fix. This is where Eddie overstepped into outright exploitation, if not enslavement. It would be this perverse and licentious urge to sexually exploit others with the aid of drugs, which would later cause his downfall. Eddie enslaved his victims using the same techniques employed by human traffickers.

Enter 26-year-old Gemmel Moore, a gay black man with the looks and physique of a male model. In school, girls swooned over Gemmel. He was an accomplished ballroom dancer with a ready smile and a mentor to his four younger siblings. Before meeting Ed Buck, he was an occasional, recreational user of soft drugs. All of that changed after he met Eddie Buck.

At first, Eddie showered young Gemmel with money and gifts. He functioned as a faux mentor to the young attractive man who was naïve to the ways of society’s dark underbelly. He had never used methamphetamine before meeting Ed Buck. Not long after Eddie had gotten Gemmel addicted to Meth, Gemmel made the following entry in his diary:

“I have become addicted to drugs and the worst one at that…Ed Buck is the one to thank. He gave me my first injection.”

Once Gemmel was addicted, the relationship changed drastically. No longer was Eddie treating Gemmel in the fatherly, caring way as he had before. Now, Eddie the predatory master, gave only commands to his new slave. Gemmal, the handsome young man, with an infectious and engaging personality was transformed into a mere sex toy for Eddie’s depraved sexual perversions.

On July 27, 2017, Ed Buck injected Gemmel Moore with what would become a fatal overdose of methamphetamine. Abruptly, the friendly, radiant, kind young man, Gemmel Moore passed into the hereafter.  Eddie called 9-1-1 but by the time law enforcement and the paramedics arrived, there was nothing that they could do for Gemmel aside from for placing his fresh corpse into a body bag.

The police gave Eddie’s apartment a cursory look through. They found drug paraphernalia and drug residue. It had to have been apparent to them that Eddie Buck himself was as high as a kite. Yet they took no action. No telephonic warrant requested to search the premises. No push for the significant details of what occurred. No arrest of Buck. Just another dead junkie, the police must have thought. The police officers summarily ruled that the tragic death of Gemmel was nothing more than an “accidental overdose.”  In the media news cycle, Gemmel was reduced to a caricature as he was frequently referred to as a “young black drug addict.”

After a couple of days of media coverage, the story surrounding the heartbreaking death Gemmel Moore, faded into the obscurity. Sorry folks, the show’s over. Nothing more to see here. The media and citizens of the greater Los Angeles area had seemed to have forgotten all about Gemmel Moore, the “young black drug addict.” That all changed shortly thereafter, when Gemmel’s family uncovered his diary.

Gemmel’s diary laid out in vivid detail, how Eddie got him addicted to Meth and enslaved him. Upon discovering the troubling entries in Gemmel’s diary concerning the nature of his relationship with Eddie, his family began seeking the assistance of community leaders and elected officials for an investigation into the matter.. The authorities however, considered the issue closed and apart from a modicum of superficial lip service from them, nothing further was done.

About 18 months later, Eddie was exploiting another man. His name was Timothy Dean. Dean also a gay black man, was described by his numerous friends, family and colleagues as a “kind, generous, and well-liked person.” He had a naturally warm personality and was active in his community. He was passionate about “social causes.”

Timothy Dean was seen visiting Eddie’s WeHo apartment numerous times. On January 7, 2019, Eddie injected Dean with a large amount of Methamphetamine which cased Dean to die. For the second time in the past 18 months, the dead body of a gay black man was carted out of Eddie’s little house of horrors by the coroner. Again, the authorities failed to obtain a search warrant after arriving or for that matter or even charge Eddie with possession of illegal narcotics. Timothy Dean’s death like that of Gemmel Moore, was ruled an “accidental methamphetamine overdose.” Really?

The sad death of Timothy Dean caused no shortage of rage within the gay and black communities where he was known by many. The anger expressed by community leaders was quite understandable. Two vulnerable, gay black men died under suspicious circumstances in Eddie’s apartment over a relatively short period of time, yet the authorities seemed to have no interest in pursuing the matter.  A well-organized campaign involving over a thousand people, was formed to seek justice for the two vulnerable men who died in Eddie’s living room. The cause received extensive media coverage.

So, a campaign for justice concerning the deaths of two down-on-their-luck, gay black men was formed and received widespread media coverage. The community was outraged over the matter. Naturally, the police immediately reopened their investigations into the deaths of the two men, obtained search warrants, and questioned Eddie Buck. Right?

Except, they did not. In fact, the police steadfastly maintained that the matter was closed. This made no sense to advocates for justice. Eddie, a wealthy white man, was an influential large donor to the Democratic Party, Democratic candidates and to progressive causes. West Hollywood, like all of Los Angels County, is a place run exclusively by liberal Democrats. This caused many to wonder if Eddie was being protected by those powerful Democratic politicians he donated so generously to.

The campaign for justice went on for over eight months with little to no action from the police. It seemed as though Eddie had a license to continue exploiting people. He undoubtedly must have thought as much because on September 4, 2019, he injected another man with an overdose of methamphetamine.

This third overdose victim was one Dane Brown.  Brown was a 26-year-old gay black man whom Eddie met online. Eddie must have been quite smitten over young Dane Brown as in addition to offering him money, he invited the young man to take up residence with him in his upscale apartment. Shortly after Dane moved into the apartment, Eddie started regularly injecting him with Methamphetamine and would give him GHB, a date rape drug- both are highly addictive.

Gee whiz, Eddie wasn’t trying to get his youthful new roommate addicted to these dangerous drugs so he could enslave and exploit him, was he? Nah. For his part, Dane wasn’t apparently much for reading newspapers or watching television newscasts. Had he done so, he might have realized what a perilous predicament he was in, given his decision to shack-up with Eddie.

In the wee hours of September 4, 2019, Eddie injected Dane with multiple doses on Methamphetamine. A blood test later revealed that Brown had five times the amount of Methamphetamine in his system as either of two other men who had died previously in Buck’s apartment had in theirs. Was Eddie growing tired of Dane and thus, simply decided to kill him with an intentional overdose?  We’ll never know and it would have been almost impossible to prove such an intent absent a confession from Eddie. What we do know is that after the third injection, Dane Brown stated he felt “nearly immobilized,” and believed that he was dying. It was reported that when he then asked Eddie to call the 9-1-1 to summon the paramedics, Eddie Buck cruelly refused to do so.

With every fiber of strength remaining in his body, Dane lurched out of the WeHo apartment and while trembling, sweating, and with a racing heart, stumbled away until he found a nearby payphone. He called the paramedics and the police. He was rushed to the hospital, and many consider it a miracle that he survived.

Dane Brown’s escape from the very clutches of death was the final nail in the proverbial coffin of Eddie Buck. This time there was a survivor. An eyewitness. One who could explain Eddie’s modus operandi. Eddie was arrested not long thereafter.

Interestingly enough, Eddie Buck was charged and tried in Federal Court. Several men were called as witnesses who had experienced Eddie’s creepy, evil hospitality. Yet the star witness was the young Dane Brown. It was Brown’s forthright and steady testimony which torpedoed the best efforts of the Eddie’s high-priced criminal defense lawyers. Brown’s harrowing ordeal as described in his own testimony, helped seal convictions against Eddie as follows:  1. Two counts of distribution of methamphetamine resulting in death. 2. Distribution of Methamphetamine. 3. Maintaining a drug-involved premises. 4. Enticing men to travel interstate for prostitution. 5. Providing drugs for compensation. 6. Using interstate Commerce to entice individuals to engage in prostitution.

Today, Eddie is living in Arizona again, where he first began his business career and political advocacy over 40 years ago. Eddie’s old stomping grounds in Phoenix have changed quite a bit since he last domiciled there in the 1980s. Yet, Eddie hardly notices the changes. In fact, Eddie never really gets around to seeing much of the city these days. That’s because Eddie’s new home is a drab, tiny prison cell in the United States Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Phoenix. These days, Eddie is referred to as “Prisoner 44535-112” in the US penitentiary system.

Buck has a tentative release date of 2051. He would be around 97 years-old then. Hence, Eddie is essentially serving a life sentence. So, happy days, right? Justice served! Hip, hip hooray! Well, not really.

This story has a terribly tragic ending. Dane Brown, the young man whose testimony put Eddie away, would later become Buck’s last victim. It was Eddie who got him hooked on Meth. Dane was never able to shake that horrible, powerful addiction. He was found lying dead on a street last year in 2024. The victim of a Methamphetamine overdose. Sometimes there are tragedies in this cruel, upside-down world that will cause your soul to ache and send hot tears streaming down your cheeks.

Rest in Peace: Gemmel Moore, Timothy Dean and Dane Brown.

The George Jackson Brigade: Inept, Disorganized Criminals Possing as Communist Revolutionaries in a Laughable Comedy of Errors

Some have suggested that the formation of the George Jackson Brigade was life imitating art vis-à-vis Woody Allen’s 1968 mockumentary, Take the Money and Run.  The comedy which was written, directed by and starring Woody Allen tells the story of the world’s most incompetent criminal. The George Jackson Brigade took themselves quite seriously even though law enforcement referred to them as, “a disorganized band of inept criminals spouting left-wing drivel to cover their criminal behavior.”  In the drivel department, the gang’s very motto, “The power of the people is the force of life,” was a meaningless, sappy if not, nebulous slogan which underscored the groups impotence as a self-proclaimed revolutionary force.

The group used the name of one George Jackson, a vile black racist who never met a white person he didn’t hate.  He hated them all, including the white gas station attendant, he murdered in cold blood for $71.00. Naturally, his dumb ass was quickly captured. George later received a life sentence for his $71.00 murder.

Tired of the newspapers characterizing him as essentially a low-life, reprehensible scumbag George, who had a grade school education, decided to take on the new and more series persona of a Black Power activist.  How convenient. George’s bold rebranding strategy worked and soon white liberals were calling George a “political prisoner.” Suddenly, Little George wasn’t merely a murderous, small-time douchebag career criminal but, a new “hero” in “the protracted struggle against the white devil.” George knew he had finally arrived when liberal white women started writing love letters addressed to him in prison. Yippie Yi yay! Little George actually reveled in his newfound celebrity among the white, liberal America hating subculture.

Unlike the group of white Leftists who would name their revolutionary group after him, George actually possessed a minimum level of competence as a criminal. In 1970, George with two fellow Black Power inmates murdered Soledad Prison guard John V. Mills who had a wife and small children at home. Upon murdering Mills, Jackson crowed, “this is the fate awaiting all blue-eyed devils!”

Jackson was transferred to San Quintin Prison where we he was killed during a daring escape attempt. After being shot by a guard, the Black Power revolutionary’s last pathetic words, spoken over an outstretched arm were, “I’m sorry…help me.” Jackson collapsed into the hereafter and undoubtedly received his First-Class ticket to board the Hell Express. The world briefly became a better place at that moment.  

George’s bona fides as a serious, hardened criminal were unquestionable. The George Jackson Brigade membership however, bore a resemblance to the bumbling outlaws in the 1975 film, Disney’s The Apple Dumpling Gang. Perhaps the FBI best described the George Jackson Brigade when they stated, “The GJB’s operations were often undermined by their own lack of precision and a disconnect between their stated revolutionary goals and the outcome of their actions.” Translation: The George Jackson Brigade members were blundering, incompetent criminals who botched almost ever capper they ever attempted, sometimes with tragic results. Think Inspector Clouseau leaving the Sûreté and undertaking a life of crime. The George Jackson Brigade was an amateurish collection of Leftist oddballs who were bumbling accident-prone, would-be criminals lurching blindly from one mistake ridden crises to the next. Examples:

The Safeway bombing: One of the most infamous examples was the group’s first failed operation in 1975 against a Safeway grocery store in Seattle. The brigade intended to plant an explosive device in the store by hiding a pipe bomb in a dog food bag. How ingenious. A Brigade member called in a nervous, confused voice to warn Safeway of the bomb but, the idiot dialed the wrong number and called the Washington Athletic Club instead.

A WAC employee answered the the phone with chirpy, “Good morning, thank you for calling the Washington Athletic Club.”

The Brigade member then bewilderedly asked, “Hello…is this Safeway?”

The WAC employee stated, “No, this is the Washington Athletic Club.”

The Brigade member then idiotically inquired with a follow up, “Do you possibly know the phone number to the Safeway?”

Without a phonebook and afraid to dial information for the Safeway phone number for fear his call could later be traced, the clueless revolutionary made no further attempts to warn Safeway. This proved to be a tragic mistake.

So, the George Jackson Brigade didn’t want the bomb to actually explode. They merely wanted to intimidate the community and show that they knew how to make an explosive device. Unfortunately, GJB members thought that they had placed a safety mechanism on the bomb to keep it from detonating.  Unfortunately, their bomb safety mechanism didn’t work, and the bomb actually did explode. This resulting explosion injured some shoppers and generated a public backlash, severely damaging the group’s public image and exposing the recklessness of their methods. The GJB also became a bit of a running joke among the people of Seattle. The GJB was attempting to establish itself as a revolutionary forced to reckoned with- if not feared. Yet they made a very poor first impression and would forever be branded as “armatures.” Soon a series of, “How many George Jackson Brigade members does to take to plant a bomb…” jokes made the rounds.

One of the jokes to make the rounds was as follows:

One George Jackson Brigade member says to another while planting a bomb, “what will happen if this one explodes while we are installing it?”

The other George Jackson brigade responds: 

“Don’t worry I’m carrying a spare!”

The Pacific National Bank Heist, Tukwila, WA.  On January 23, 1976, four emboldened members of the GJB, John Sherman, Ed Mead, Bruce Seidel and John Cook walked into the Pacific National Bank. Seidel slipped the bank teller a misspelled robbery note with illegible penmanship.  

“I’m sorry, what is this?” The teller asked. The confused bank teller couldn’t make heads or tails of the note.

“Would you just read it…please,” Seidel skittishly begged with sweat beads forming on his brow.

“I’m sorry sir, I can’t read your handwriting, may I have your account number and some identification please?” The Teller requested.

“This…is a stick up… bitch!” A now very panicked Seidel screamed for all to hear then, brandished a gun.

The bank teller hit the alarm button and Seidel’s GJB accomplices drew their weapons as John Sherman admonished Seidel out loud to, “stick to the plan man!”

Mead and Cook ordered everyone to the ground.  The luckless foursome had expected to be out of the bank within 60 seconds, yet it took much longer to collect the money than they had anticipated. Meanwhile, a couple of GJB members started rattling off leftist slogans for the edification of the bank’s customers, turning the capper into a briefly improvised 60’s style, teach-in. Despite the delay in gathering the money from the bank, the criminal’s ringleader, John Sherman, wasn’t too worried. The group had placed a number of bombs in local hotels that were expected to detonate during the planned robbery in order to divert local police resources away from the bank. Yet- surprise, surprise! – these diversionary bombs never detonated, and a group of local police officers arrived as the bungling criminals were exiting the bank.

John Sherman opened fire on the police.  And the incompetent criminal foursome immediately received return fire. Founding GJB member Bruce Seidel was cut down when he attempted to squeeze off a round at the police. His gun didn’t fire, and things might have gone better for Seidel had he bothered to notice that his weapon was still in safety mode and further, that there was no round in the chamber. Sherman, who stood a few yards away from Seidel’s dead body, took a police officer’s bullet to his face. He dropped with his hands in the air and begged, “Please, no more! Don’t shoot!” Comrade Che would have been proud.

The Downfall. The GJB continued their streak of incompetent robberies and other criminal capers until they were all captured and an sent away to prison. One FBI agent perhaps summed up the unclimactic end of the GJB best, “They never got any better at it (crime). They never improved or learned from their mistakes. It was always one bungled job after the next.”

With the GJB members all in prison, some area residents lamented about the loss of the comedic fodder they enjoyed so much from the GJB’s prolific blunders. The George Jackson Brigade jokes soon became just an old memory for those who lived through that time. Virtually all of the GJB members are dead now. Most were released from prison before they died. In the end, one should ask, What if anything did the George Jackson Brigade accomplish?

The answer is simply this: Apart from the comedic entertainment inspired by their doomed foray into criminality which so many enjoyed, they accomplished nothing.

The 1960s Hippie-Esque Mutiny Aboard the Navy Destroyer USS Vance (DE-387)

Lieutenant Commander Marcus Aurelius Arnheiter Testifies Before Congress

“The Caine is an old, tired ship,” explained Navy Lieutenant Commander William De Vriess to Ensign Willie Keith in the novel, The Caine Mutiny. Those same words would have been an accurate description of the USS Vance an Escort Destroyer, on December 22, 1965, when the US Navy sent one of its up-and-coming officers with a stellar record, to take command of the Vance (DE-387). Who was that officer?  His name was Lieutenant Commander Marcus Aurelius Arnheiter, a graduate of the United States Navay Academy who had been promoted to Lieutenant Commander ahead of his peers in July of 1962 based on his outstanding record. He was considered a strong contender for another “below the zone” or early promotion to Commander after his tour as the skipper of the USS Vance. Arnheiter enjoyed a reputation as being “intelligent, well-spoken and full of energy.” He had been previously praised for his outstanding service as an officer aboard the battleship, USS Iowa. After his stint on the Iowa, Arnheiter provided intelligence briefings and analysis to the Navy’s top leadership at the Pentagon- a plum staff assignment reserved for high performing officers. Arnheiter had caught the eye of more than one Admiral in this assignment and on his last Officer Fitness Report (NAVPERS 310) was considered one who showed the potential to serve at the “highest echelons of the US Navy’s command structure.”  

That “old, tired ship” the USS Vance, was an underperforming vessel with morale problems. It wasn’t that the crew was bad. As is most often the case, the morale problems aboard the USS Vance stemmed from a lack of strong leadership. The Navy’s top brass thought sending in an officer of Anteiter’s high caliber would retore morale and high-performance levels on the Vance. On the eve of his taking command of the Vance, Arnheiter received a congratulatory telegram from Navy Chief of Operations, Admiral David L. McDonald.

After assuming command of the USS Vance, Arnheiter noticed as he was warned, that the destroyer was in lackluster shape- The aging WWII vintage ship was viewed by many of the enlisted crew as an outdated “beaten-up old tub.” The previous lack of proper leadership had caused discipline on the Vance to become lax, and the ship had deteriorated into a messy, cluttered heap with patches of rust. The old destroyer seemed to be in constant need of repair. Many of the Vance’s officers appeared to have a lackadaisical attitude toward their duties.  Shortly after the official Change of Command ceremony onboard the Vance, Arnheiter met with his officers in the destroyer’s wardroom and informed those junior officers that significant changes needed to be made right away. It all made sense- right? A new captain comes aboard a troubled, floundering ship and insists on making changes. For Lieutenant Commander Marcus Aurelius Arnheiter, this is where his problems would begin.

Of the Vance’s fifteen officers among the crew of over 100 men, Arnheiter was the only Regular Navy Officer. The rest held Navy reserve Commissions and most seemed to have done ROTC in college to avoid eventually being drafted into the Army. By and large, they were not career offices as Arnheiter was. The Vance was one of the destroyers to participate in Operation Market Time, the Navy’s effort to prevent seaborne infiltration from the Viet Cong along the South Vietnamese coast as well as the interdiction of maritime vessels carrying weapons and military supplies for the same. Most of the officers on the Vance seemed to be just marking time and appeared to lack enthusiasm for their important mission. Many of these junior officers aboard the Vance set a poor example for the rated enlisted sailors who comprised the crew. Arnheiter put his foot down and insisted that his officers be clean shaven and that they be in the proper uniform while the destroyer was underway. Arnheiter demanded that his officers set the proper example for the enlisted sailors in their charge.

The grumbling and disdain these officers held for Arnheiter began shortly after they were told to clean up. Arnheiter would conduct meetings with his officers geared toward improving morale aboard the Vance. They were pep talks in a way, and all Captains of ships in the Navy did them and still do. Arnheiter would sometimes open these meetings with his junior officers by reading a prayer from the United States Naval Institute’s book, Prayer’s at Sea. The recitation of such prayers was not uncommon in the 1960s US Navy. He would also use examples of famous American fighting men from history to motivate his mostly unenthusiastic officers to improve and set high personal standards. This was customary for a Captain to do at the time. Some of his liberal officers took offense over Arnheiter’s daring to recite prayers from the Navel institute book and took their grievances to a handpicked and wild-eyed, liberal Navy Chaplin in a letter of complaint.  The Chaplin, a Roman Catholic seemed more interested in what we might call today “woke social justice,” than in promulgating the Gospel of Jesus Christ or for that matter, the mission of the military.

Arnheiter was singled mindedly driven to turn the Vance around. Most of the enlisted sailors were happy to see higher standards and discipline being enforced. Sailors, like all other servicemen desire to serve in an organization or on a ship that they can take pride in and reflects highly upon them and their work.

Among most of the Vance’s junior officers, the story seemed to be quite different. These individuals were serving their time in a relatively safe and comfortable environment compared the Marines and Army soldiers fighting in Vietnam. The junior officers onboard the Vance were simply biding their time until they were released back into the civilian world where they could pursue their intended careers or professions. They seemed to have no problem with the slack ship.  In short a rebellion was forming onboard the Vance. A mutiny of sorts. History shows us that almost all mutinies on naval ships are from “below deck.” This meaning that it is almost always the enlisted sailors who rebel against their Captain and the other officers. Here, however it seems this cowardly if not strangely passive aggressive mutiny, was the product of the rebellious atheistic liberal streak among a number of the Vance’s junior officers who seemed to have other places they would rather be than serving their country in a war zone.

These rebellious officers created a “Mad Marcus” logbook to write down their collective complaints against and jokes about their accomplished commander. It should be noted that this act alone was sufficient to have these men charged with military Non-Judicial Punishment or even a Courts Martial for both disrespect to a superior officer as well as insubordinate conduct unbecoming a Naval officer. Article 89 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice dictates that “Any person…who behaves with disrespect toward his superior commissioned officer shall be punished as a court martial shall direct. This cabal of disgruntled officers made it their new life’s mission to take their Captain down for no other reason that he wanted to clean up the USS Vance.

The letter written by some of the officers serving on the Vance was acted upon by the liberal Chaplin stationed in Pearl Harbor.  This Catholic Chaplin stubbornly hounded the chain of command until finally they relented and decided to send another Chaplin handpicked by the liberal Catholic Chaplin, to visit the USS Vance to take a sensing of the command climate.

This very liberal Protestant Chaplin with under six months of Navy service and who was the choice of the liberal catholic Chaplin, first met with the group of disgruntled junior officers onboard the Vance. One must keep in mind that at this point, nobody was denying that drastic and positive changes were happening on the USS Vance. Standards were restored. Morale was up. The destroyer no longer “looked like a heap” and the enlisted crew members were performing well and once again took pride in their ship.

Despite the positive turnaround, the disgruntled junior officers leveled complaint after complaint against Arnheiter to the young investigating Chaplin- most of which amounted to a subjective analysis of the job their Captain was doing. Finally, when the rookie Chaplin asked them to file written charges against Arnheiter they all, to a man, balked. How odd. Later, several senior Petty Officers (NCOs) where interviewed by the investigating Chaplin. Those Petty Officers expressed admiration for the work Arnheiter was doing in turning the ship around and reported no major disgruntlement among the enlisted sailors.  The Chaplin later issued his report. Case over. Issue resolved. Right?

Unfortunately, no. In his report, the young investigating Chaplin took the information provided by the mutinous officers and he ran with it. He added his own ill-informed, progressive 1960s esque opinions of the overall situation. He then took a bizarre step further and compared the junior officer’s refusal to obey Arnheiter’s orders as akin to the duty of refusal imputed the defendants at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials. Yes, really. “I was only following orders” would be no excuse for obeying the evil tyrant Arnheiter.

After a successful combat operations off the coast of South Vietnam, the USS Vance arrived in Subic Bay, The Philippines. At exactly 8:00 PM that evening, a Navy Commadore boarded the USS Vance, located Lieutenant Commander Arnheiter and informed him that he had been relieved of command pending an investigation. Arnheiter, the destroyer Captain with an impeccable military record now out of the blue, faced a ruined career and professional humiliation over the malicious accusations of a faction of disgruntled and indolent junior officers who resented the discipline and high standards enforced by the Captain who they referred to as a “lifer,” a derogatory name for a career officer. Arnheiter had been Captain of the Vance for only 99 days.

Shortly after Arnheiter left the Vance, some of the disgruntled officers began circulating against Navy regulations, spurious documents and drawings mocking their former skipper. Many of the Petty Officers aboard the Vance where appalled by the sophomoric antics of these junior Commissioned Officers. This bound collection of vulgar descriptions and vile caricatures of Arnheiter took on the very trappings up of stateside subversive hippie style counterculture magazines peddled in 1960s San Francisco. This alone should have had these young impudent officers placed before a courts martial.

There were initial concerns over the way Arnheiter was relieved of command given that Navy regulations called for such accusations like those made by some of his junior officers to be delivered in writing to the Captain while affording him an opportunity to respond. Instead, a brief hearing was conducted after Arnheiter was relived. Witnesses were called who were both favorable and unfavorable toward Arnheiter. In the end, the single senior officer presiding over the hearing for some inexplicable reason, sided with the junior officers over the objections of the NCOs and the decision to relive Lieutenant Commander Arnheiter was sustained. Arnheiter faced a rush to judgment, and this perfunctory and brief hearing constituted a denial of his right to due process.

The hearing officer forwarded his findings of this hastily conducted proceeding to the commander of the Pacific Cruiser-Destroyer Force Rear Admiral Walter H. Baumberger, for his approval. Baumberger was shocked over the entire proceeding which he believed amounted to trivial and unfounded charges by a group of disgruntled and unprofessional junior officers. He dismissed all of the numerous charges against Arnheiter save three which he marked as “insignificant or frivolous.” Further, Admiral Baumberger wanted answers as to why this superb naval officer with an impeccable record was subjected to the humiliating act of being whisked away from his ship and run through what amounted to an “improper, non-regulation kangaroo court.”  Baumberger saw the rebellious attitudes of 1960s American university students seeping into the minds of certain junior officers who were themselves, recent college graduates.

Again, for some unexplained reason, the Navy Department of Personal overruled Admiral Baumberger and reinstated the relieve for cause order against Arnheiter. For his part, Arnheiter didn’t give up. With more information having been provided to him by the mostly loyal enlisted crew, Arnheiter was able to present a complete picture through this additional evidence, of the concerted effort on the part of a faction of junior officers to subvert his authority on the ship and thwart his efforts to retore discipline and high standards of conduct aboard the Vance. The picture painted indicated that the wrong man had been punished.  The documented evidence of these junior officer’s attempts to “covertly sabotage” Arnheiter’s efforts to rehabilitate the USS Vance, were provided to the Secretary of the Navy.

Perhaps the gist of the situation was best explained by one of the Vance’s senior Petty Officers in his declaration, “The trouble was that people (junior officers) had been too used to being lazy and didn’t want to change. As soon as he (Arnheiter) left, everything slumped again.”

The Commander of the Battleship USS New Jersey, Captain Alexander had read the charges against Arnheiter and sent a letter to the Secretary of the Navy in support of Arnheiter. Soon, the issue reached the hallowed halls of the US Congress. The House Armed Services Committee took up Arnheiter’s cause, and five days of hearings were held which essentially lambasted the Navy’s actions in summarily relieving Arnheiter. The Committee Chairman and other members of congress sent a letter to the Secretary of the Navy demanding Arnheiter’s reinstatement and disciplinary action against the mutinous junior officers abord the USS Vance. In all, 88 members of the United States Congress signed a petition to the Secretary of the Navy asking for Arnheiter to be reinstated and for the unseemly blot on his otherwise impeccable career to be removed. Yet, no action was taken.

Perhaps this talented and dedicated naval officer was the first unjustly persecuted victim in what today is known as the “cancel culture.”